The Second Amendment

March 19, 2008 | By Richard Matthews

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” — Second Amendment of the United States Constitution

This to me is a very simply explained concept and well written amendment.

In order to secure liberty it could be necessary for the people to defend it with arms from an enemy, foreign or domestic. In addition to the security realities of the day, I believe that the intent of the founders was to create the ultimate of the many checks and balances in the Constitution via this amendment.

There are of course many reasons for a free person to desire to own a firearm. Hunting is the cherished past time of many regions and families. Marksmanship is a sport of Olympic stature. Great enjoyment is found by those who collect and care for firearms. Of course protection of one’s home and the safety of one’s family is of paramount concern to many gun owners. All of the issues I listed are enough to convince me that our Constitution’s position on arms is correct. Free people, in the exercise of their liberty, should be able to do any activity so long as that activity does not conflict with another person’s exercise of their own liberty.

However, what is actually the substantive point of this issue and this cherished amendment, is that by allowing the citizens to remain armed this preserves their right to give consent to be governed. Without the clearly defined rights in the Second Amendment, the people lose the ability to rebel and therefore lose their ability to consent to be governed. Reductions of the strength of the Second Amendment via legislation is contrary to the revolutionary spirit of our nation’s founding. I feel those who signed the Declaration of Independence would look on with scorn at those who attempt to cheapen the significance of these concerns.

I am anxious to read the Supreme Court’s opinion in District of Columbia vs. Heller. Regardless of that opinion and its affect on the regulations of the states, I will not vote for any additional Federal regulation of firearms if elected to Congress and will work to rescind the majority of those on the books.

- Richard Matthews

Originally posted February 8th, 2008

2 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. “I believe that the intent of the founders was to create the ultimate of the many checks and balances in the Constitution via this amendment.”

    You don’t have conjecture about the intent of the founding fathers on the 2nd amendment. The anti-federalists papers (written by those in favor of a bill of rights, including Patrick Henry) explains their intent quite clearly. I don’t understand how gun laws and full-out hand gun bans fits with “shall not be infringed.”

    Here is their 17th proposed amendment -

    17th. That the people have a right to keep and bear arms; that a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defence of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and ought to be avoided, as far as the circumstances and protection of the community will admit. And that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

    (My fiance blogged about this here http://ralree.info/2008/3/19/that-the-people-have-a-right-to-keep-and-bear-arms )

    I’m relatively new to the MD area and I’ve had a little culture shock with regards to the role of government keeping everyone “safe.”
    I can’t think of a home in my Alaskan neighborhood that wasn’t armed. Half my high school friends were on the school riflery team. I remember people walking around downtown Anchorage with new weapons from a gun show - the only controversy was one of animal rights vs. hunting.

    I’m glad to know I’m not alone in this state :)

    Comment by Kelsey — March 29, 2008 #

  2. Well said. Thank you for recognizing your own limitations as a would-be ruler. I support your candidacy.

    Comment by Justin Vest — March 31, 2008 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
18 queries. 0.344 seconds.
Powered by WordPress with jd-desert theme design by John Doe.